Madness from Beyond the Mountains

dduane:

That Green Lantern one will do, thanks. :)

Geek wedding rings FTW!!!!!

polyamorousmisanthrope:

wittingaccomplice:

dubpron:

transversepea:

faun-songs:

grammaryogurt:

sapphy-go-lucky:

ju5t4n3rd:

obamamia

Greetings pringle can,
you contain delicious chips,
that i must consume.

Big wad of blankets
You keep me so warm at night
I love you so much

The mathbook samba
Thrown onto ground in anger
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck

Conditioner of air,
I am so grateful of you
you’ll keep me cool

Pitch black printerI do not speak your flashy languagePlease stop gagging on paper I dont like fisting you to get it out.

oh vodka, dear booze
so sweetened are you with juice
i will regret this

turtles chocolate boxsweet delicacies awaitbeneath your striped lid

Wall with paint of white
Wall that is exterior
Drafty without you

Velvet Jewelry Bag
Holding exotic treasures
Oyster spit and silk

Narnia poster.
You were my childhood dreams.
Talking Lions win!

polyamorousmisanthrope:

wittingaccomplice:

dubpron:

transversepea:

faun-songs:

grammaryogurt:

sapphy-go-lucky:

ju5t4n3rd:

obamamia

Greetings pringle can,

you contain delicious chips,

that i must consume.

Big wad of blankets

You keep me so warm at night

I love you so much

The mathbook samba

Thrown onto ground in anger

Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck

Conditioner of air,

I am so grateful of you

you’ll keep me cool

Pitch black printer
I do not speak your flashy language
Please stop gagging on paper
I dont like fisting you to get it out.

oh vodka, dear booze

so sweetened are you with juice

i will regret this

turtles chocolate box
sweet delicacies await
beneath your striped lid

Wall with paint of white

Wall that is exterior

Drafty without you

Velvet Jewelry Bag

Holding exotic treasures

Oyster spit and silk

Narnia poster.

You were my childhood dreams.

Talking Lions win!

spineye:

amandaonwriting:

Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (BPA) - Resource for Crime Writers

SOURCE

well you never know when this might come in handy.

Reblogging so I can hug these pics tight FOREVER!

gropingyourmuse:

bofurthetoymaker:

the-crazy-geek:

50shades-of-blue:

thelonelytheif:

sylphorix:

Still under the impression that video games are strictly for kids? Hilda Knott would like to have a word with you. And perhaps a game.
The 85-year-old British gamer has been mashing buttons for 40 years — roughly the life of the video game industry – and is showing no signs of slowing down.
We’re not talking about just a bunch of boring PC card games, either. In a video interview with the BBC, Knott, who turns 86 next month, shows off her formidable gaming setup, including a sweet 65-inch HDTV and a brand new Playstation 3 Superslim. She discusses her love of Grand Theft Auto IV, which she had a “hilarious” time playing with her 94-year-old-aunt.
Knott acknowledges that her deep love of gaming has helped her stay mentally fit, because “a lot of them have puzzles, working out how to do something.”
She isn’t joking, either, as the video shows her playing the niche tactical role-playing game, Disgaea 4. That’s hardcore. This lady is a gamer, through and through.
And while many of her fellow octogenarians credit games like Wii Sports for keeping them physically active, Knott’s favorite part about playing video games will sound more familiar to the Halo crowd.
“Finding something new in the game,” she says. “Getting on to the next stage, or the next event. And the achievement of finishing it.”
With 40 years of gaming under her belt, we imagine she’s finished quite a few. Hats off to you, Hilda!

I salute you.

Hilda Knott is now the Mother of Gaming

If I survive to that age I want to be like her.

((My uncle is like 56 and has been gaming since systems and PC’s have came out. He’s the shit. xD))

Hilda Knott, the Patron Saint of Girl Gamers

I WILL BE HER IN FIVE YEARS. But with the advantage that I started as a teenager (though tabletop). I will not be so old. I will die having gamed for probably seventy years, kids. WOOO HOOO!

gropingyourmuse:

bofurthetoymaker:

the-crazy-geek:

50shades-of-blue:

thelonelytheif:

sylphorix:

Still under the impression that video games are strictly for kids? Hilda Knott would like to have a word with you. And perhaps a game.

The 85-year-old British gamer has been mashing buttons for 40 years — roughly the life of the video game industry – and is showing no signs of slowing down.

We’re not talking about just a bunch of boring PC card games, either. In a video interview with the BBC, Knott, who turns 86 next month, shows off her formidable gaming setup, including a sweet 65-inch HDTV and a brand new Playstation 3 Superslim. She discusses her love of Grand Theft Auto IV, which she had a “hilarious” time playing with her 94-year-old-aunt.

Knott acknowledges that her deep love of gaming has helped her stay mentally fit, because “a lot of them have puzzles, working out how to do something.”

She isn’t joking, either, as the video shows her playing the niche tactical role-playing game, Disgaea 4. That’s hardcore. This lady is a gamer, through and through.

And while many of her fellow octogenarians credit games like Wii Sports for keeping them physically active, Knott’s favorite part about playing video games will sound more familiar to the Halo crowd.

“Finding something new in the game,” she says. “Getting on to the next stage, or the next event. And the achievement of finishing it.”

With 40 years of gaming under her belt, we imagine she’s finished quite a few. Hats off to you, Hilda!

I salute you.

Hilda Knott is now the Mother of Gaming

If I survive to that age I want to be like her.

((My uncle is like 56 and has been gaming since systems and PC’s have came out. He’s the shit. xD))

Hilda Knott, the Patron Saint of Girl Gamers

I WILL BE HER IN FIVE YEARS. But with the advantage that I started as a teenager (though tabletop). I will not be so old. I will die having gamed for probably seventy years, kids. WOOO HOOO!

approachingsignificance:

8 Myths About Scientists
I stumbled across this in Thick Books and Thin Films by Adam Ruben. Pretty good.
Myth #1: Scientists frequently make “breakthroughs.”
Truth: Scientific discovery is agonizingly slow. The only time I’ve ever run naked through the streets yelling “Eureka!” is when I forgot to refill my prescription.
Myth #2: Scientists work in isolation.
Truth: Scientists are even prouder of setting up collaborations than they are of actual results. Most scientific talks end with a slide listing all collaborators like little badges of honor—and the less similar the collaborator’s field, the prouder the scientist. “Well, you know, I might have discovered a cure for tuberculosis,” a scientist will say, “but what I’m really excited about is this new collaboration with an Icelandic poet!”
Myth #3: Scientists possess useful skills.
Truth: Scientists possess useful laboratory skills. But you should never allow a physicist to wire your house.
Myth #4: Scientists follow the scientific method as it was taught in high school: Observation, Question, Research, Hypothesis, Experiment, Conclusion.
Truth: In reality, the way scientists work is more like: Fiddle Around, Find Something Weird, Retest It, It Doesn’t Happen a Second Time, Get Distracted Trying to Make It Happen Again, Go to Chipotle, Recall the Original Purpose of Your Research, Start Over, Apply for Funding for a Better Instrument, Publish Some Interim Fluff, Learn That Someone Has Scooped You, Take Your Lab in a New Direction, Apply for Funding for the New Direction, Collaborate With an Icelandic Poet, Eat Chipotle With an Icelandic Poet, Co-Write Scientifically Accurate Ode to Walrus, Get Interested in Something Unrelated, Apply for Funding for Something Unrelated, Notice That 20 Years Have Passed.
Myth #5: Experiments always yield data that teach or reveal something.
Truth: Let’s say you’re doing an experiment with five mice. These particular mice will turn either yellow or blue. So you walk into the lab expecting to see five yellow mice, which will point to one explanation, or five blue mice, which will point to the other. Instead you would see one yellow mouse, one green mouse, one striped mouse, one plaid mouse (dead), and one mouse that has somehow sewn himself a little blue jacket, though he doesn’t wear it all the time.
Myth #6: A personal tragedy can turn a scientist evil.
Truth: Very few scientists are legitimately evil, though the number rises if you ask graduate students to characterize their advisers. Besides, it’s hard to be truly evil when you don’t have any practical skills.
Myth #7: A scientist can be proficient in all branches of science.
Truth: Exactly what discipline did the professor from Gilligan’s Island specialize in? Chemistry? Mechanical engineering? Coconut-based transistor radio construction? Any time a problem needed solving or a device needed building, the professor knew exactly how to do it. That guy could make anything. Except a boat.
People who don’t understand science assume that scientists can master any subfield. That’s why we’re often asked for our opinions about scientific news items, and we can only reply, “Uh … sorry … I know I’m a molecular phylogeneticist, and this story was about molecular phylogenetics, but, well, I’m a different kind of molecular phylogeneticist.”
Myth #8: Scientists are not sexy beasts.
Truth: Scientists are indeed sexy beasts. Not only do our lab coats make us look dapper and charming, those same coats look even better strewn unceremoniously over a standing lamp while we make passionate love to you.
 

Especially #8. :D
The rest are UNRESERVEDLY correct as explained. Especially as I’m a quality control chemist. As Rob (bf) says, I make sure there’s no plutonium in the baby formula. 

approachingsignificance:

8 Myths About Scientists

I stumbled across this in Thick Books and Thin Films by Adam Ruben. Pretty good.

Myth #1: Scientists frequently make “breakthroughs.”

Truth: Scientific discovery is agonizingly slow. The only time I’ve ever run naked through the streets yelling “Eureka!” is when I forgot to refill my prescription.

Myth #2: Scientists work in isolation.

Truth: Scientists are even prouder of setting up collaborations than they are of actual results. Most scientific talks end with a slide listing all collaborators like little badges of honor—and the less similar the collaborator’s field, the prouder the scientist. “Well, you know, I might have discovered a cure for tuberculosis,” a scientist will say, “but what I’m really excited about is this new collaboration with an Icelandic poet!”

Myth #3: Scientists possess useful skills.

Truth: Scientists possess useful laboratory skills. But you should never allow a physicist to wire your house.

Myth #4: Scientists follow the scientific method as it was taught in high school: Observation, Question, Research, Hypothesis, Experiment, Conclusion.

Truth: In reality, the way scientists work is more like: Fiddle Around, Find Something Weird, Retest It, It Doesn’t Happen a Second Time, Get Distracted Trying to Make It Happen Again, Go to Chipotle, Recall the Original Purpose of Your Research, Start Over, Apply for Funding for a Better Instrument, Publish Some Interim Fluff, Learn That Someone Has Scooped You, Take Your Lab in a New Direction, Apply for Funding for the New Direction, Collaborate With an Icelandic Poet, Eat Chipotle With an Icelandic Poet, Co-Write Scientifically Accurate Ode to Walrus, Get Interested in Something Unrelated, Apply for Funding for Something Unrelated, Notice That 20 Years Have Passed.

Myth #5: Experiments always yield data that teach or reveal something.

Truth: Let’s say you’re doing an experiment with five mice. These particular mice will turn either yellow or blue. So you walk into the lab expecting to see five yellow mice, which will point to one explanation, or five blue mice, which will point to the other. Instead you would see one yellow mouse, one green mouse, one striped mouse, one plaid mouse (dead), and one mouse that has somehow sewn himself a little blue jacket, though he doesn’t wear it all the time.

Myth #6: A personal tragedy can turn a scientist evil.

Truth: Very few scientists are legitimately evil, though the number rises if you ask graduate students to characterize their advisers. Besides, it’s hard to be truly evil when you don’t have any practical skills.

Myth #7: A scientist can be proficient in all branches of science.

Truth: Exactly what discipline did the professor from Gilligan’s Island specialize in? Chemistry? Mechanical engineering? Coconut-based transistor radio construction? Any time a problem needed solving or a device needed building, the professor knew exactly how to do it. That guy could make anything. Except a boat.

People who don’t understand science assume that scientists can master any subfield. That’s why we’re often asked for our opinions about scientific news items, and we can only reply, “Uh … sorry … I know I’m a molecular phylogeneticist, and this story was about molecular phylogenetics, but, well, I’m a different kind of molecular phylogeneticist.”

Myth #8: Scientists are not sexy beasts.

Truth: Scientists are indeed sexy beasts. Not only do our lab coats make us look dapper and charming, those same coats look even better strewn unceremoniously over a standing lamp while we make passionate love to you.

 

Especially #8. :D

The rest are UNRESERVEDLY correct as explained. Especially as I’m a quality control chemist. As Rob (bf) says, I make sure there’s no plutonium in the baby formula. 

My cat now has to do this. I CLOSED the fortress of solitude!
(She has been hiding in my spa since I re-homed her from my niece, sigh.)

My cat now has to do this. I CLOSED the fortress of solitude!

(She has been hiding in my spa since I re-homed her from my niece, sigh.)

dduane:

nonelvis:

gritsinmisery:

I need this patch badly.

You and me both.

. )

Needed!

dduane:

nonelvis:

gritsinmisery:

I need this patch badly.

You and me both.

. )

Needed!

theartofanimation:

Melani Sie

That’s pretty much  my childhood…or the way it played in my head. 

kazujun:

If Sherlock was anything other than a consulting detective I want it to be this

I used to threaten to buy metric lab glassware and equipment to stock my kitchen. I UNDERSTAND metric measurements. How many cups in a parsec, again?

kazujun:

If Sherlock was anything other than a consulting detective I want it to be this

I used to threaten to buy metric lab glassware and equipment to stock my kitchen. I UNDERSTAND metric measurements. How many cups in a parsec, again?